Improving Transition Outcomes Project (ITOP) Multi-Agency Unified State Plan (State Plan)
Sponsor
California Workforce Investment Board
June 2006
Funded under a grant/contract supported by the Office of Disability Employment Policy of the U. S. Department of Labor, grant/contract #E-9-4-3-0101. The opinions contained in this publication are those of the grantee/contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the U. S. Department of Labor.
Title | Executive Summary | Partners | Framework | Academic Excellence | Career Development | Youth Development and Support | Youth Leadership | Comprehensive Approach | Table 1 | Table 2 | Additional Resources | Terms and Definitions
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Additional Resources and Information
IMPROVING TRANSITION OUTCOMES TO SERVE YOUTH
WITH DISABILITES PROJECT (ITOP)
MULTI-AGENCY UNIFIED STATE PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On September 30, 2003, the California Workforce Investment Board (State Board) received a grant from the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP). The purpose of the grant project was to work with federal, state and community agencies and organizations to help young people with disabilities in making the transition into the workforce. The grant has also provided an opportunity for system change in creating a more youth friendly one-stop system, provide outreach to the community and employers on resources and services for youth with a disability, and, help youth with disabilities transition to self-sufficient adults.
DOL/ODEP Requirements
As part of the requirements of the grant, DOL/ODEP asked states to:
- Direct the mapping of resources to assess the delivery of youth services in light of evidence-based transition operating principles, identifying available assets and resources within the state;
- Develop, implement and evaluate a multi-year state plan that will enhance transitional outcomes for youth with disabilities;
- Conduct local demonstration projects to determine ways in which youth with disabilities can obtain transition services through community partnerships and intermediary organizations; and
- Collaborate with federal, state and local public and private sector resources to demonstrate the long-term sustainability of the grant objectives within California.
PLAN DEVELOPMENT
Through a series of stakeholder meetings and online conferencing, and work group meetings, a discussion draft document was constructed and used as a basis for development of the Multi Agency Unified State Plan (State Plan) and presented to the ITOP State Advisory Group. State Board staff took the discussion draft and created the framework for development of the State Plan.
The framework considers three overarching themes:
- Aligning systems
- Preparing and supporting people with disabilities for employment
- Meeting the needs of business.
The above overarching themes are consistent with the Governor’s Committee on Employment of the People with Disabilities (GCEPD) themes; support the AB925 Comprehensive Strategy; the DOL Youth Vision; The California Council on Youth Relations Roundtables; and the State Board Two-Year Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Strategic Plan.
The DOL Employment and Training Administrations Strategic Vision for Youth Services under WIA has identified the youth most in need as:
- Foster Youth
- Incarcerated Youth
- Migrant Youth
- Youth of Incarcerated parents
- Youth with Disabilities
- Native American and Indian Youth
Youth with disabilities intersect all youth populations identified as youth most in need and as explained in the following paper written by the National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability (NCWD).
Why Do I Need to Care about Providing Effective Services to Youth with Disabilities in Implementing ETA’s Youth Vision? The Numbers Speak for Themselves
"Disability is a natural part of the human experience. People with disabilities appear throughout our society; in all ethnic groups, geographic regions and governmental programs and services. Yet there continues to be a stubborn dilemma facing youth with disabilities. That is, in spite of supportive legislation and identified effective practices, these youth continue to experience high unemployment as well as insufficient opportunities to obtain competitive employment with the potential of career growth. Compared to their non-disabled peers, youth with disabilities are more likely to live in poverty and be dependent upon public assistance programs.
Consider the following facts:
Special education students are more than twice as likely as their peers in general education to drop out of high school;
Current special education students can expect to face much higher adult unemployment rates than their peers without disabilities;
- The adjudication rate of youth with disabilities is four times higher than for youth without disabilities;
- The pregnancy rate for youth with disabilities is much higher than the national average: among females with learning disabilities, for example, 50% will be pregnant within three years of school exit;
- Young adults with disabilities are three times likelier to live in poverty as adults than their peers without disabilities;
- More than half of youth identified with mental health needs will drop out of school and only between five and 20 percent will enter postsecondary education;
- Less than a quarter of youth with mental health needs will receive any formal services from mental health or social service agencies;
- Two thirds of those with learning disabilities are not identified by the school system. The majority of this population of youth with disabilities tends to be very poor, disproportionately female and minority, and more often than not they have not graduated from high school; and
There are some limited studies emerging that are beginning to document high representation of youth with learning disabilities in populations of runaway and homeless youth, in the foster care system, and in the juvenile justice system."
Alternative Education
In 2001, the University of Minnesota received a grant from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs to conduct research on alternative schools across the country. Special emphasis was given to studying how and the extent to which students with disabilities are being served within these settings. This study (1) revealed that about 12% of all students in alternative schools and programs for at-risk students were special education students with Individualized Education Programs (IEP). The percentage of special education students varied widely between districts—ranging from 3% to 20% (typically students with learning or emotional/behavioral disabilities). It is clear students with disabilities are attending alternative schools; yet, questions remain about the extent to which and how students with disabilities are being served in these settings.
Foster Care Youth
"As many as 98% of children in the foster care system have disabilities" --Karen Jorgenson of the National Foster Parent Association (NFPA).
Problems identified range from relational and coping difficulties and school failure to emotional and behavioral disturbances causing moderate to severe impairment, with conduct disorder, attention disorders, aggressive behavior, and depression being the most common. It is estimated that between 20% and 60% of young children entering foster care have a developmental disability or delay. These types of disabilities include cerebral palsy, mental retardation, developmental delays, and learning disabilities, as well as speech, hearing, and vision impairments. This compares with an estimate of about 10% among the general population.(2)
Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
30% to 50% of incarcerated youth have disabilities (Casey & Keilitz, 1990; Murphy, 1986). The prevalence of youth with disabilities is three to five times greater in juvenile corrections than in public school populations. This troubling phenomenon, called overrepresentation or disproportionate representation, occurs most frequently among incarcerated youth with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), learning disabilities (LD), and mild mental retardation (MR) (Rutherford, Bullis, Anderson, & Griller, 2000). These disabilities often occur together.(3)
Migrant Youth
Farmworkers in general have high rates of depression. Extreme poverty and hardship, the stress of job uncertainty and frequent moves, and social stigmatization and isolation are contributing factors. This is true for children and youth as well. Studies have also linked depression in teenage workers to long hours of work in high-intensity, low-skilled jobs-precisely the kind of labor undertaken by farmworkers.
As a result of these pressures, farmworkers are vulnerable to substance abuse, which can alleviate pain and offer a temporary escape from difficult lives. It also includes drugs taken for the express purpose of getting more work done. Some farmworker youth use drugs "in order to fulfill the demands of work. This is particularly true for boys and young men working at the piece rate, where the pace at which one works directly determines earnings. "They use speed to make it through the day,"
Juvenile farmworkers are routinely exposed to dangerous pesticides, suffering rashes, headaches, dizziness, nausea and vomiting. Long-term consequences of pesticide poisoning include cancer, brain damage, and learning and memory problems."(4)
There is no clear data tracking concerning how many youth with disabilities compose these populations and the data available is often under reported. In the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) programs individuals self-identify their disability that creates some degree of barrier to employment. Youth data for WIA Program Year 2005-06 to date (May 31, 2006) reported 3201 youth served via formula funds (5) and 76 youth served by Governor’s 15% funds.
The California Department of Education has identified 681,000 students with a disability enrolled in special education. Of those 681,000 special education students 222,869 are transition age youth, 14-22. (See Tables 1 & 2)
Without a coordinated and comprehensive service delivery system, youth with a disability may be under-supported, lack access to respite care, employment assistance, and other specialized transition programs. Early identification is a challenge and may result in inappropriate placement decisions and inadequate provision of services for children and youth with disabilities.
Partners in the development of the ITOP State Plan Vision, Goals, and Objectives included youth, parent advocates, employers, local and State public/private agencies. These partners were very engaged in the ITOP project, by developing the State Plan framework, and identifying specific strategies and tasks to support the framework. In the development of the State Plan the partners took into consideration early intervention and prevention as key to youth becoming self-sufficient adults.
Through the State Plan development process the partners identified the following outcomes:
- Interagency Collaboration
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration
- Functional, Life Skills and Curriculum
- Student Input and Self-Determination/Advocacy
- Family/Parent Input
- Career, Vocational, and Education Assessment
- Social/Personal Skills Training
- Integrated Classroom/Program/Community
- Business/Industry/School Linkages
- Effective IEP Documents and Procedures
- Improved Reporting and Data Collection
STATE PARTNERS:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation/Division of Juvenile Justice
California Department of Education Special Education Division
California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
California State Independent Living Council
Chancellor’s Office of California Community Colleges, DSPS Unit
Department of Mental Health
Department of Rehabilitation
Department of Social Services Foster Care Ombudsman
Employment Development Department Workforce Inclusion Division
Governor’s Committee on Employment of People with Disabilities
Sonoma State University/California Institute for Human Services
FEDERAL PARTNERS:
Department of Labor Office of Disability Employment Policy (DOL/ODEP)
National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability (NCWD)
Social Security Administration Center for Disability
EMPLOYERS, LOCAL AGENCIES, AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS INCLUDE:
Able-Disabled Advocacy, Inc., San Diego
Crossroads Employment Services
Jewish Vocational Services
LILA Project UCLA
Pride Industries
San Francisco Support For Families
Shasta Smart Career Connections
Ventura County Workforce Investment Board
Work Training Programs, Inc. of Ventura
Citations
(1)Alternative Schools and Students With Disabilities: Identifying and Understanding the Issues, National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Information Brief (October 2004)
(2) Comprehensive Assessments for Children Entering Foster Care: A National Perspective, PEDIATRICS Vol. 112 No. 1 July 2003, pp. 134-142
(3) The National Center on Education, Disability and Juvenile Justice
(4) Fingers to the Bone: United States Failure to Protect Child Farmworkers (2000)
(5) Formula funds are the funds allocated to the local Workforce Investment Areas in CA. Of the WIA funds received from the National WIA allocation, CA reserves 85% as formula funds and 15% in the Governor's Discretionary fund.
FRAMEWORK FOR A MULTI-AGENCY UNIFIED STATE PLAN
The framework supports a comprehensive approach to system change and coordination. It encompasses the quality elements of a Comprehensive Youth Serving System as the basis for the State Plan, outlining the plan vision, goals and objectives. Further State Plan development addresses specific strategies and task to accomplish the goals and objectives.
VISION STATEMENT
As a result of sustained leadership and collaboration, a youth-guided and user-friendly system will exist to promote academic, career and personal development to support youth with disabilities and to assist them to achieve their personal goals and fulfill their highest potential. All youth and caring adults will have readily accessible information that supports and provides resources for this effort.
QUALITY ELEMENTS OF A COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVING SYSTEM
I. ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
Goal: Youth with disabilities are engaged in their learning and supported to achieve high academic standards.
Objective 1: School personnel (educational staff and administrators (K-18), youth with disabilities and parents/advocates understand the relationship between academics, work-based learning and transition connecting activities.
Objective 2: Students have the academic, social and emotional assets and strengths they need in order to be prepared for transition.
Objective 3: All transitioning youth demonstrate career competency and are prepared for the workplace and/or post secondary education.
Objective 4: All transitioning youth and their parents/advocates will have the education, information, and support needed to maximize academic achievement and prepare for post secondary education and career options
Objective 5: The schools and community organizations collaborate to ensure that transitioning youth have a wide range of post school services and support to succeed in adult life
II. CAREER DEVELOPMENT
GOAL: Youth with disabilities are engaged in their learning about choices that enable them to match their interests, abilities and skills with a career
Objective 1: Schools provide age appropriate career development learning opportunities and transition youth to the next level.
Objective 2: Employers are encouraged to provide a wide variety of opportunities for youth with disabilities.
Objective 3: Increase career development resources and comprehensive services for out of school youth.
Objective 4: All possible funding sources need to be identified, effectively utilized. The issue of sustainability must also be addressed.
Objective 5: Career development plans focus on the individual and connects them with appropriate career development resources.
III. YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT
GOAL: All youth with disabilities and caring adults will have readily available access to resources and services to help make informed decisions about their future.
Objective 1: Coordinated efforts are in place to identify youth with disabilities at the earliest opportunity.
Objective 2: All youth are connected to a comprehensive support network of caring adults and peers to assist them in developing self-sufficiency
Objective 3: All youth have access to resources that support the development of personal, social and independent living skills critical to their successful transition to adulthood
Objective 4: Information and resources on youth development and support services are in place, up to date, user friendly and widely available.
IV. YOUTH LEADERSHIP
GOAL: All youth take an active role in designing, implementing and evaluating the activities and opportunities available to them. Youth are engaged and visibly active in leadership roles.
Objective: Age appropriate opportunities are available for youth with disabilities to learn and develop leadership skills.
V.COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
GOAL:Each community has a formal, comprehensive network that provides the foundation for an equitable and coordinated system of care for youth with disabilities and their families.
Objective 1: Community leaders, schools, service organizations, families, businesses and other partners are engaged at the state and local levels to implement intermediary networks that support youth with disabilities
Objective 2: An operational infrastructure is in place that supports a systems wide approach to improving transition outcomes for youth with disabilities. Intermediary networks and community organizations collaborate on a wide range of employment, educational, support, and training related activities.
Objective 3: Intermediary networks engage in coordination of systems and services to ensure maximum utilization of resources and a quality system responsive to emerging needs.
Objective 4: Intermediary networks and community organizations engage in comprehensive outreach and advocacy to promote increased understanding and services, ensure all components of the system are connected, and the community supports a focus on youth issues.
PLAN IMPLENTATION AND EVALUATION
When the State Plan is reviewed and approved by the Secretary of the Labor and Workforce Development Agency and the appropriate State agency partners, the next step is to develop an implementation plan using the following Strategies and Task as a guide. Additionally, through self-evaluation, continuous improvement, and system change assessment, three years from the date of implementation, agencies will have data and outcomes to identify those strategies that were most successful in meeting the State Plan goals, objectives, and outcomes.
IMPROVING TRANSITION OUTCOMES PROJECT
MULTI-AGENCY UNIFIED STATE PLAN STRATEGIES AND TASKS
I. ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE
GOAL: Youth with disabilities are engaged in their learning and supported to achieve higher academic standards.
I.1. Objective: School personnel (educational staff and administrators (K-18), youth with disabilities and parents/advocates understand the relationship between academics, work-based learning and transition connecting activities
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| I.1.1 | Enhance the knowledge and skills of school personnel by providing training on transition topics: planning, self determination, self- advocacy, disability sensitivity, laws, best practices, and effective use of learning accommodations, (including technology). |
|
| I.1.2 | Collaborate with emerging or existing groups working on school reform initiatives to ensure that the Quality Elements of a Youth-Serving System are integrated into Policy and School Reform agendas |
|
I.2. Objective: Students have the academic, social and emotional assets and strengths they need in order to be prepared for transition.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| I.2.1 | Engage youth in their transition process based on their developmental assets. Include their schools, parents/advocates, youth-serving organizations and the employment and training community at large |
|
| I.2.2 | Provide sensitivity training to educate youth and youth-serving organizations about disabilities, self-advocacy and how to communicate their needs for accommodations. |
|
I.3. Objective: All transitioning youth demonstrate career competency and are prepared for the workforce and/or post secondary education
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| I.3.1 | Support access for youth with disabilities to programs that integrate career development and work-based learning experiences into the academic curriculum to prepare them for transition to adult life. |
|
| I.3.2 | Support the integration of skills development and certification programs into career and technical education curriculum and work experiences to measure career competency. |
|
I.4. Objective: All transitioning youth and their parents/advocates will have the education, information and support needed to maximize academic achievement and prepare for post secondary education and career options.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| I.4.1 | Support programs that provide youth and parents/advocates with education on the importance of high school graduation/completion and the impact of educational attainment on career options. |
|
| I.4.2 | Encourage access to academic support that will support high school graduation/completion and postsecondary education and career options |
|
| I.4.3 | Encourage access for youth to participate in life skills curriculum to prepare them for postsecondary school goals and achieving economic self-sufficiency. |
|
I.5 Objective: The schools and community organizations collaborate to ensure that transitioning youth have a wide range of post school services and support to succeed in adult life.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| I.5.1 | Support community resource mapping to provide youth and parent/advocates with a list of all available programs and services. |
|
| I.5.2 | Support post-school services as part of the Individual Education Plan to ensure continuity of services for youth in achieving long-term goals. |
|
II. CAREER DEVELOPMENT
GOAL: Youth with disabilities are engaged in their learning about choices that enable them to match their interests, abilities and skills with a career.
II. 1. Objective: Schools provide age appropriate career development learning opportunities and transition youth to the next level.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| II.1.1 | Promote training and preparation in career development for teachers from pre-school through post-secondary institutions | Use the "National Career Development Guidelines" to train all teachers and school personnel in the three domains listed to achieve all the goals under each domain for each child.
The three domains:
Content is further described by eleven goals. The goals define broad areas of career development competency. |
| II.1.2 | Support the provision of a wide range of employment opportunities for youth with disabilities. |
|
II.2. Objective: Employers provide a wide variety of opportunities for youth with disabilities
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| II.2.1 | Encourage access to work based learning for all youth including youth with disabilities... |
|
| II.2.2 | Support the engagement of Employers as full workforce partners in providing employment opportunities and developing workforce skills and career goals with special needs youth. |
|
II.3. Objective: Increase career development resources and comprehensive services for out of school youth
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| II.3.1 | Connect youth with disabilities with career development and comprehensive services prior to exiting school; service will follow them in achieving post school goals and independent living. |
|
| II.3.2 | Support Increased collaboration among intermediary organizations providing services to out of school youth with disabilities. |
|
| II.3.3 | Promote access to the services and resources needed to achieve career goals and independent living for all out of school youth. |
|
| II.3.4 | Engage out of school youth in obtaining the career development and comprehensive services needed to succeed in independent living. |
|
II.4. Objective: All possible funding sources need to be identified, effectively utilized. The issue of sustainability must also be addressed.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| II.4.1 | Increase collaboration between agencies to maximize and sustain funding. |
|
II.5. Objective: Career development plans focus on the individual and connects them with appropriate career development resources
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
II.5.1 |
Encourage a person centered approach to develop a career plan for youth with disabilities. |
|
III. YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT
GOAL: All youth with disabilities and caring adults will have readily available access to resources and services to help make informed decisions about their future.
III.1. Objective: Coordinated efforts are in place to identify youth with disabilities at the earliest opportunity.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| III.1.1 | Promote early identification and intervention of young children with disabilities. |
|
III.2. Objective: All youth are connected to a comprehensive support network of caring adults and peers to assist them in developing self-sufficiency.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| III.2.1 | Encourage family members and primary caring adults to be engaged and supported in assisting youth transition to adulthood. |
|
| III.2.2 | Youth with disabilities have a personal employment and training transition plan, which guides all other plans. |
|
| III.2.3 | Support the engagement of other caring adults to provide mentoring and support in the transition process |
|
III. 3 Objective: All youth have access to resources that support the development of personal, social and independent living skills critical to their successful transition to adulthood.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| III.3.1 | For successful transition, support access to the training needed to develop interpersonal skills for all youth with disabilities |
|
| III.3.2 | Support access to independent living skills training and support services to increase positive transition outcomes. |
|
III.4 Objective: Information and resources on youth development and support services are in place, up to date, user friendly and widely available.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| III.4.1 | Utilize a resource map for career development information and resources. |
|
IV. YOUTH LEADERSHIP
GOAL: All youth take an active role in designing, implementing and evaluating the activities and opportunities available to them. Youth are engaged and visibly active in leadership roles.
IV.1. Objective: Age appropriate opportunities are available for youth with disabilities to learn and develop leadership skills.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| IV.1.1 | From pre-school throughout post-secondary, educational experiences should provide opportunities to learn and practice leadership skills, including self-advocacy and self-determination. Youth with disabilities have equal access to leadership skills training and opportunities in community settings. |
Review currently used leadership skill, self-advocacy and self-determination curriculum to include:
|
| IV.1.2 | Increased opportunities to participate in variety of equal leadership roles (including those that make decisions, drive policies and shape the system serving them) through coordinated efforts. |
|
V. COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
GOAL: Each community has a formal, comprehensive network that provides the foundation for an equitable and coordinated system of care for youth with disabilities and their families.
V.1.Objective: Community leaders, schools, service organizations, families, businesses and other partners are engaged at the State and local levels to implement intermediary networks that support youth with disabilities.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| V.1.1 | Support community planning meetings that bring community leaders and intermediary partners together to form networks that support youth with disabilities. |
|
| V.1.2 | Intermediary networks that serve or advocate for youth, are formed based on existing best practices. |
|
| V.1.3 | Support the development of intermediary networks that include community leaders, school districts, service providers, parents and families, employers, and youth to develop a coordinated transition system for youth with disabilities. |
|
V.2. Objective: An operational infrastructure is in place that supports a systems wide approach to improving transition outcomes for youth with disabilities. Intermediary networks and community organizations collaborate on a wide range of activities.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| V.2.1 | Support opportunities for intermediary partners to educate each other and improve transition for youth |
|
| V.2.2 | Support Intermediary networks and community organizations that implement community needs assessment inclusive of all partners to determine existing best practices and service needs. |
|
| V.2.3 | Community resource mapping is conducted to identify existing services for youth with disabilities and service gaps |
|
| V.2.4 | Intermediary networks coordinate strategic planning efforts to develop priorities and an action plan for improving transition outcomes for youth with disabilities |
|
V.3.Objective: Intermediary networks engage in coordination of systems and services to ensure maximum utilization of resources and a quality system responsive to emerging needs.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| V.3.1 | Improve communications and coordination between intermediaries and systems of care involved with youth. |
|
| V.3.2 | Support programs that coordinate the accessibility and provision of case management services for the transition of all youth with disabilities. |
|
| V.3.3 | Support the development and use of a system that is focused on the quality of transition services provided to youth with disabilities and continuous improvement in that system. |
|
| V.3.4 | Develop methods for identification of youth with disabilities involved in multiple systems of care and the sharing of information across service systems. |
|
| V.3.5 | Support the development and measurement of performance related to transition outcomes for youth with disabilities. |
|
| V.3.6 | Develop methods to improve systems accountability, evaluation, and planning for continuous improvement of transition services and outcomes for youth with disabilities. |
|
V.4. Objective: Intermediary networks and community organizations engage in comprehensive outreach and advocacy to promote increased understanding and services, ensure all components of the system are connected, and the community supports a focus on youth issues.
| STRATEGIES | TASKS | |
|---|---|---|
| V.4.1 | Improve community awareness and support of youth with disabilities in their transition to adulthood and independent living. |
|
| V.4.2 | Examine existing policies and advocate for policy changes at the state and local level that improve transition outcomes for youth with disabilities. |
|
| V.4.3 | Develop coordinated funding strategies and initiatives to support transition services for youth with disabilities. |
|
TABLE 1
California Department of Education
Special Education Division
Reporting Cycle: December 1, 2004
Prepared: 6/2/2006 10:06:30 AM
Special Education Enrollment by Age and Disability Statewide Report
Youth 14 – 22 in Special Education
|
(MR) |
(HH) |
(DEAF) |
(SLI) |
(VI) |
(ED) |
(OI) |
(OHI) |
(SLD) |
(DB) |
(MD) |
(AUT) |
(TBI) |
Total |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 |
3,189 |
564 |
326 |
3,452 |
342 |
3,311 |
890 |
3,316 |
36,973 |
20 |
336 |
1,300 |
162 |
54,181 |
15 |
3,034 |
488 |
303 |
2,310 |
272 |
3,465 |
823 |
2,874 |
35,800 |
15 |
344 |
1,109 |
157 |
50,994 |
16 |
2,968 |
494 |
264 |
1,781 |
271 |
3,700 |
845 |
2,573 |
34,055 |
20 |
334 |
815 |
176 |
48,296 |
17 |
2,871 |
432 |
324 |
1,369 |
292 |
3,372 |
729 |
2,033 |
30,165 |
23 |
310 |
665 |
155 |
42,740 |
18 |
2,177 |
174 |
195 |
450 |
134 |
1,400 |
462 |
675 |
10,241 |
16 |
277 |
433 |
81 |
16,715 |
19 |
1,580 |
60 |
75 |
69 |
87 |
364 |
318 |
163 |
1,463 |
5 |
188 |
301 |
51 |
4,724 |
20 |
1,380 |
32 |
40 |
17 |
60 |
144 |
276 |
59 |
339 |
6 |
185 |
215 |
33 |
2,786 |
21 |
1,186 |
23 |
20 |
17 |
57 |
60 |
209 |
28 |
152 |
5 |
166 |
178 |
13 |
2,114 |
22 |
198 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
6 |
35 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
23 |
20 |
3 |
319 |
Total |
44,263 |
7,608 |
4,462 |
176,265 |
4,798 |
27,912 |
15,321 |
35,650 |
328,381 |
266 |
5,926 |
29,370 |
1,747 |
222,869 |
TABLE 2
California Department of Education
Special Education Division
Reporting Cycle: December 1, 2004
Prepared: 6/2/2006 10:16:54 AM
Special Education Enrollment by Grade and Disability Statewide Report
| Grade |
(MR) |
(HH) |
(DEAF) |
(SLI) |
(VI) |
(ED) |
(OI) |
(OHI) |
(SLD) |
(DB) |
(MD) |
(AUT) |
(TBI) |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kindergarten |
1,665 |
203 |
215 |
18,824 |
215 |
126 |
771 |
834 |
1,943 |
17 |
279 |
2,636 |
39 |
27,767 |
Grade 1 |
2,117 |
338 |
228 |
24,526 |
268 |
345 |
940 |
1,352 |
4,830 |
7 |
305 |
2,824 |
55 |
38,135 |
Grade 2 |
2,306 |
433 |
231 |
24,312 |
281 |
662 |
963 |
1,894 |
11,287 |
7 |
309 |
2,564 |
84 |
45,333 |
Grade 3 |
2,435 |
484 |
270 |
22,510 |
281 |
1,031 |
966 |
2,452 |
19,079 |
10 |
323 |
2,382 |
93 |
52,316 |
Grade 4 |
2,614 |
594 |
278 |
18,117 |
310 |
1,417 |
1,053 |
2,922 |
25,285 |
13 |
336 |
2,256 |
99 |
55,294 |
Grade 5 |
2,735 |
605 |
297 |
13,229 |
314 |
1,807 |
964 |
3,215 |
29,456 |
22 |
361 |
2,204 |
117 |
55,326 |
Grade 6 |
2,914 |
617 |
286 |
8,651 |
340 |
2,306 |
1,013 |
3,251 |
31,243 |
10 |
384 |
2,003 |
138 |
53,156 |
Grade 7 |
3,033 |
565 |
285 |
5,931 |
296 |
2,688 |
944 |
3,274 |
32,797 |
11 |
330 |
1,733 |
131 |
52,018 |
Grade 8 |
2,971 |
618 |
299 |
4,204 |
312 |
3,047 |
885 |
3,240 |
34,550 |
18 |
321 |
1,424 |
150 |
52,039 |
Grade 9 |
3,399 |
592 |
348 |
3,040 |
324 |
3,996 |
889 |
3,365 |
39,847 |
16 |
380 |
1,285 |
173 |
57,654 |
Grade 10 |
3,078 |
493 |
284 |
2,100 |
278 |
3,836 |
802 |
2,822 |
35,850 |
19 |
331 |
929 |
170 |
50,992 |
Grade 11 |
2,911 |
447 |
279 |
1,591 |
249 |
3,360 |
783 |
2,257 |
31,653 |
21 |
310 |
734 |
167 |
44,762 |
Grade 12 |
3,962 |
426 |
383 |
1,244 |
321 |
2,757 |
1,057 |
1,737 |
26,972 |
29 |
427 |
900 |
167 |
40,382 |
All Others |
8,123 |
1,193 |
779 |
27,986 |
1,009 |
534 |
3,291 |
3,035 |
3,589 |
66 |
1,530 |
5,496 |
164 |
56,795 |
Total |
44,263 |
7,608 |
4,462 |
176,265 |
4,798 |
27,912 |
15,321 |
35,650 |
328,381 |
266 |
5,926 |
29,370 |
1,747 |
681,969 |
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AND INFORMATION
Youth Involved in Multiple Systems
Foster Care System
30-40% of foster youth are in special education (Curtis Richards, National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability / Institute for Educational Leadership)
Over 35% of foster youth are in special education
46% of foster youth fail to complete high school compared with 16% of non-foster youth (Children’s Law Center of Los Angeles Fact Sheet)
Juvenile Justice System
32% of juvenile justice youth are in special education compared to 9% of all youth in United States (Quinn, Rutherford, Leone and Nelson 2001) – 46% of these youth had a specific learning disability and 45% had emotional disturbance
45-75% of juvenile justice youth have one or more disabilities including emotional and behavioral disorders, learning disabilities and developmental disabilities (Parent Advocacy Coalition for Educational Rights, 2006)
25-42% of San Francisco juvenile justice youth are in special education depending on the census – an average of 33.5% (Woodside Learning Center, San Francisco Juvenile Probation)
Mental Health Service System
The Transition Age Youth Program (TAYP) estimates 90-95% of youth and young adults seen for services have been in special education (TAYP, Children & Family Behavioral Health Services, Department of Health) this means that at least 5-10% of youth with mental health disabilities were not in special education.
Adult Transition Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities
35% of adults with disabilities have full or part time jobs while the employment rate for adults without disabilities is 78%
26% of adults with disabilities have incomes below $15,000 annually (poverty level) – 9% of adults without disabilities have incomes below $15,000 annually
21% of youth with disabilities do not complete high school compared with 10% of youth without disabilities
"Source: 2004 National Organization on Disability/Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities "
30% of youth with disabilities do not complete high school.
19% of youth with disabilities enter post secondary education compared to 40% of youth without disabilities
"Source: National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, funded by US Department of Education, 2005"
California High School Exit Exam Pass Rates (2005)
| Mathematics | English Language Arts | |
|---|---|---|
| All Students | 70% | 64% |
| Special Education | 24% | 27% |
"Source: California Department of Education, Division of Special Education, San Francisco Unified School District Data"
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
SCANS, Work Keys |
General employability (soft) skills that apply to all occupations and are included in California Career Technical Education Standards. |
|---|---|
Individual Education Plan (IEP) |
Individual Education plan as mandated by Individuals with Disabilities Education Act for students enrolled in special education. |
Person Centered Planning |
A process to develop plans for services that focus on the individual their personal vision of their future. |
Asset-based Approach |
A service delivery approach that is based on the Search Institute’s 40 Developmental Assets |
| Benefits Planning | Financial planning that helps individuals consider the impact of work on social security benefits. |
| Assistive Technologies | Increase independence for individuals through the use of software and hardware and technology advances. |
| Accommodations | Strategies used by employers and educators to increase the independence of an individual with disabilities in the workplace and the classroom. |
| Personal Services | Individualized menu of services available for individuals with disabilities. |
Intermediary Network |
A national association of leading educational and workforce development organizations working in local communities to ensure student success. |
The Communities of Learning |
An educational reform initiative |
The Intermediary Guidebook |
A guide for Intermediaries in their function to strengthen the connections among education, workforce development and community resources. |
| Evidenced-based Transition Principles | A set of processes, procedure, and principles that, when implemented, have been shown to reliably produce a measurable and sustainable improvement in productivity, efficiency, or effectiveness. |
Title | Executive Summary | Partners | Framework | Academic Excellence | Career Development | Youth Development and Support | Youth Leadership | Comprehensive Approach | Table 1 | Table 2 | Additional Resources | Terms and Definitions